tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post7894578765915229845..comments2024-03-28T10:56:09.433-05:00Comments on UNSEALED - World News | Christian News | Prophecy Updates: O Come, O Come, Emmanuel!Garyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03907296435997404954noreply@blogger.comBlogger53125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-5279100012884682472017-09-14T13:10:15.435-05:002017-09-14T13:10:15.435-05:00#3 "...this generation shall not pass away......#3 "...this generation shall not pass away..." (paraphrased)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-79809166438156451642017-09-12T18:08:16.344-05:002017-09-12T18:08:16.344-05:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13167091502532099922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-58148501576233148802017-09-12T18:05:40.350-05:002017-09-12T18:05:40.350-05:00Amen
Amen<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13167091502532099922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-31092250137927611552017-09-12T18:04:49.851-05:002017-09-12T18:04:49.851-05:00Reminds me of the new convent Matthew 26:29 where ...Reminds me of the new convent Matthew 26:29 where Jesus said , But I say unto you , I will not drink from this fruit of the vine , from now on until that DAY that I drink it NEW with you in my fathers Kingdom !Rapture , Wedding day ? Maranatha !Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13167091502532099922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-40501336065749282972017-09-07T14:21:56.175-05:002017-09-07T14:21:56.175-05:00Amen!Amen!SilentKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12410574595446614515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-77977567734300589152017-09-07T13:38:51.100-05:002017-09-07T13:38:51.100-05:00The apokalypsis of the sons of God came to mind as...The apokalypsis of the sons of God came to mind as I read this article:<br />For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation(apokalypsis) of the sons of God. - Romans 8:19 KJV<br />And not only [they], but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, [to wit], the redemption of our body. - Romans 8:23 KJVLyn Melvinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01898791437892948435noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-56126602270955751652017-09-06T09:58:59.374-05:002017-09-06T09:58:59.374-05:00It's always awesome when God hears and respond...It's always awesome when God hears and responds to our desire to know him and understand him better.SilentKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12410574595446614515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-88874933070862131032017-09-06T08:26:28.241-05:002017-09-06T08:26:28.241-05:00Amen Preacher Gary!Amen Preacher Gary!Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01231266645636577442noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-75808002214118765112017-09-06T08:11:15.547-05:002017-09-06T08:11:15.547-05:00I don't quite get all that you are saying in t...I don't quite get all that you are saying in this article, but I find it very interesting. Especially since the day before I read it the Lord answered my prayer to be led in the truth about the sign in Rev. 12 by speaking to me through songs and road signs. He put in my mind that Immanuel God with us will happen at the rapture. We will be one then. (Like Jesus prayed in John 17). I guess He knew I just needed it explained simply :) I hope the next article comes out soon!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02445070607718694360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-2716727188999201222017-09-05T15:02:47.720-05:002017-09-05T15:02:47.720-05:00My wife and I were talking of the first Pentecost ...My wife and I were talking of the first Pentecost today on the way to an appointment. Today was the first time I have discussed it with anyone from the perspective of conception and not birth. <br /><br />During that conversation I had a bit of an epiphany. She was perplexed by Isaiah 66:7, which makes perfect sense! Afterall, "Who has seen such things?" But I immediately blurted out something that could only have come from the Holy Spirit. <br /><br />Christ, the Head of the Church was born first was He not? Why is it strange that the head comes before the body? Then I realised that human childbirth is just like that! We are meant to be born head first followed by the body. <br /><br />This may be a reason why we see the Sign in two different lights. One light being the birth of Christ, The Head of the Church to be followed by the Church which is His Body at the Rapture. <br /><br />If so, then even the human occiput anterior (head first) position childbirth foreshadows the Rapture.<br /><br />Blessings to all, <br /><br />PRPastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-87073618165604135682017-09-05T06:49:18.314-05:002017-09-05T06:49:18.314-05:00So so beautiful!
Thank you so much for this. Our ...So so beautiful!<br />Thank you so much for this. Our God is so great and wonderful!<br />Maritsahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08534010794387980907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-44123767203560664452017-09-04T11:53:48.399-05:002017-09-04T11:53:48.399-05:00All,
One more note on the model provided above. ...All, <br /><br />One more note on the model provided above. Double counting was troublesome to me. I am not saying that it is wrong, but it did not sit well with in my spirit. It was a stumbling block in working with this until recently. <br /><br />My studies did not begin in what I have called the "Line of Joseph" from Matthew. (Linked above and reflective of SilentKnight's inspired writing). My studies began with the "Line of Mary" from (Luke 3:23-38 NKJV). Luke traces Jesus earthly lineage all the way to Adam, "the son of God." Matthew does not. <br /><br />Chief reasons I started by using G-D the father of Abraham in my "Line of Joseph" are found in (Luke 3:38 NKJV) and (Deuteronomy 6:5 NKJV). G-D should be first in all things, the beginning and the end. This is how these spreadsheets are modelled. G-d the Father of all things and first in all things. G-d the Son, the last which is first. All things point to the Christ.<br /><br />Secondly, is that Luke specifically names Adam as "the son of God." It was then a natural thing to begin my study of Matthew with G-D the Father of Abraham. This is an unspoken truth in the lineage of Joseph so I began the line from Abraham with G-D The Father as generation zero in one view, Abraham His son as generation one in another. <br /><br />The number of generations from G-D The Father to Christ who Fathered His Church is 42-generations. (0-41) The number of generations from Abraham the father of Isaac to the Church being the child of Christ is 42-generations. (1-42). Forgive me for repeating my earlier posting.<br /><br />It just became apparent that there were parallel lines being reconciled one to another. G-D to Abraham (and his children). Christ to His children (the Church).<br /><br />In this view there was no overlap as a result of the deportation. Just another perspective.<br /><br />YBiC<br /><br />PR<br /><br />Pastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-44786733428795079412017-09-04T10:55:07.116-05:002017-09-04T10:55:07.116-05:00SK,
I had also ran into the problem of double co...SK, <br /><br />I had also ran into the problem of double counting in my model. This is when I considered the differentiation of Jesus and Christ generationally and came to much the same conclusion you have shared here.<br /><br />PRPastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-48523465108489449862017-09-04T10:48:26.644-05:002017-09-04T10:48:26.644-05:00Annabel,
Thank you for your response! I think w...Annabel, <br /><br />Thank you for your response! I think we are on the same page and I rather like your choice of the word "conception". That may be better understood in our modern context. For if the Church is seen in light of a developing fetus yet to be born in the presence of G-D, then we do have a complete picture of the Church Age as being that of a child in the womb, all Her days written and complete in Christ.<br /><br />I honestly think that we can view the first Pentecost as either birth or conception. It is a matter of perspective. Part of the beauty and symmetry of the Gospel is it's ability to shed light (truth) through many different perspectives, as light through a diamond. <br /><br />Thinking "out loud", both birth and conception are equal to life and are differentiated by developmental progress. If the church was born on Pentecost, then it has since been progressing developmentally until a future point in time. Conception does not impart this concept, thus why I would not have used that term. That said, "conception" does perfectly describe the inception of the Church at Pentecost, one which will be born on Her delivery day; the Rapture. <br /><br />So I can see it both ways. Thank you for expanding my viewpoint in this!<br /><br />Excellent, thank you!<br /><br />I am continuing to do my own study into the finer details of the FOT per execution, timing and duration.<br /><br />Blessings to you!<br /><br />YBiCPastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-23121894578143478642017-09-04T08:55:28.700-05:002017-09-04T08:55:28.700-05:00Couple things that might help:
1. The word for V...Couple things that might help: <br /><br />1. The word for Virgin in Isaiah 7 can also mean young woman. Else it would not have been fulfilled in Ahaz's wife. Remember, there are multiple fulfillments of this prophecy, but it started with an immediate fulfillment for Ahaz. <br /><br />2. Certainly, Jesus did fulfill elements of "God With Us", but notice that even Isaiah 9 did not add Emmanuel to Jesus' names. Once again, though, I won't take the title from Jesus, I'm just adding it to the Sons. <br /><br />3. Rev 12 does not mention conception, but I believe that is implied by the fact that she is pregnant. The Isa 7 prophecy covers both the conception and the birth. Rev 12 is dealing with the later stages of pregnancy and the birth.<br /><br />4. Counting Jechonias twice is certainly a valid way of looking at things. But I believe counting that generation only once is also valid. If you just count the generations mentioned in Matt 1, you will not find 42, only 41 and the missing one is in the last group. It is true that if you break it down based on Babylon, then Jechonias was involved before and after (or rather during), but the wording of "14 generations" is not true. So I think Matthew may have been inspired to allow this ambiguity so that we could see this hidden secret at some point.<br /><br />Your viewpoints are certainly important. What I wrote is just something to consider, and if it brings joy and/or understanding that is wonderful. <br /><br />Thanks for reading and for your thoughts.<br />SilentKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12410574595446614515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-47931057507517256622017-09-04T08:35:15.777-05:002017-09-04T08:35:15.777-05:00Thanks for sharing your research Richard. I haven...Thanks for sharing your research Richard. I haven't read through what you wrote, but will try to get a chance to do so.SilentKnighthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12410574595446614515noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-5488893682264838202017-09-04T04:18:40.568-05:002017-09-04T04:18:40.568-05:00Sorry, I can't quite see it. It explicitly not...Sorry, I can't quite see it. It explicitly notes 'from Abraham to David', if we count Abraham as 1 (rather than starting first at Abrahams offspring), then there is no issue with counting Jechonias twice, particularly as Matthew is explicit in noting "from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations". From the carrying away is different to 'after babylon' which is when Jechonias had his son. I believe counting Jechonias twice here is intentional.<br /><br />and let us not forget Isaiah 9 "For unto us a Child is born,<br />Unto us a Son is given;<br />And the government will be upon His shoulder.<br />And His name will be called<br />Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,<br />Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace"<br /><br />His earthly name was 'Jesus', but he was indeed our "Wonderful, Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace", and our King of Kings, our Lord of Lords, and most definitely our Emmanuel, for Jesus, at his birth, literally became God with us (on earth), and when Christ ascended into heaven, God remained "with us" (as the Holy Spirit), and he will be with us (his bride) in flesh/spirit in the coming kingdom.<br /><br />Note that Mary did not call Jesus 'Wonderful', 'counsellor' etc, as all these names embodied the trinity, just as Emmanuel embodies the trinity in its entirety.<br /><br />The key scripture to all this. Isaiah 7 - and a VIRGIN will give birth to a son. Israel was called virgin Israel at one point, but also accused of being an adulterous wife. Mary was the only individual who could fulfil this. A constellation 'virgo' that we see as a great sign in heaven, cannot be counted the same as Isaiah 7, as we know that the virgin in Isaiah was conceived with child, virgo Rev12 does not mention conception, and was not deemed a virgin in Rev12.Through and Throughhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08518570218409369814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-30711452685909257142017-09-04T01:32:36.785-05:002017-09-04T01:32:36.785-05:00My mind is blown. My heart is pounding and spirit ...My mind is blown. My heart is pounding and spirit is weeping with confirmation from God the Father. He has been showing me 7:14 everywhere repeatedly for months, I didn't know what He was trying to show me. 7-14 is my birthday, but I was sure it was something much more. Tonight it was confirmed, through more REVEALING and confirmation of what is coming.. My heart is overwhelmed with His continual confirmations and my spirit so excited. Nurse4hurtinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14543215049566719192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-14847172153952635192017-09-04T00:31:56.059-05:002017-09-04T00:31:56.059-05:00Dear Richard I tend to follow Scott Clarkes explan...Dear Richard I tend to follow Scott Clarkes explanation about Pentecost being the "conception" of the church by the Holy Spirit and rapture i.e. resurrection equalling the "birth" which was long time teached with a misleading label. As he explains it it makes complete sense to me with so many other scriptures about "birth". Furthermore, the day and time of the rapture is clearly stated by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:52 so it HAS TO be at the Feast of Trumpets. Blessings, YSICAnnabelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04642374040696665532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-72868687783747972912017-09-04T00:23:33.791-05:002017-09-04T00:23:33.791-05:00How can a comparison Joseph-Jesus be blasphemic? J...How can a comparison Joseph-Jesus be blasphemic? Joseph and his brethren is the most stunning foreshadow to Christ revealing himself to Israel in the end of 7 years tribulation. "Jesus has no sons"? Now who are WE then if " he and the father are 1" John 10:30? Ephraim was blessed before Manasseh and is a foreshadow of the "multitude of nations" (Genesis 48:19) See Matthew 5:9 / Luke 20:36 / Romans 8:14+19; 9:26 / Galatians 3:26 we are constantly called "Sons of God". We are called his brethren and friends too but Jesus calls his disciples "children" too - see John 21:5 those were adult men going fishing! ;) Peace and grace unto youAnnabelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04642374040696665532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-75589949891971803122017-09-03T17:09:20.493-05:002017-09-03T17:09:20.493-05:00Find the spreadsheet I created here: http://www.f...Find the spreadsheet I created here: http://www.firstflightmedia.com/Rich/Line-of-Joseph.xls<br /><br />Feel free to study, change, debunk or expand on it if you will.<br /><br />With thanks, <br /><br />PRPastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-70794399280444075332017-09-03T17:05:22.393-05:002017-09-03T17:05:22.393-05:00Wow, what a find. You were surely led by the Spiri...Wow, what a find. You were surely led by the Spirit in this. One of the greatest revelations of all time I think. The altitude of my peace joy and strength are soaring. The value and significance of this website is immeasurable. Its like an indestructible tank we are riding in through a battlefield. Thank you! !!!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15552192833043501809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-9214814676673352902017-09-03T17:02:35.444-05:002017-09-03T17:02:35.444-05:00Brilliant! (Part Two)
Another spreadsheet I creat...Brilliant! (Part Two)<br /><br />Another spreadsheet I created maps the first Pentecost. If we understand that our Lord Jesus Christ was crucified on Friday, April 3, 33AD (The Day of the Cross according to historical and stellar research by Rick Larson on the Star of Bethlehem) and that He rose on the third day being, Sunday, April 5, 33AD; then we can count the days until His Ascension being, Friday, May 15, 33AD (assuming His ascension in daylight based upon ). This would make the birthday of the Church on Saturday, May 23, 33AD.<br /><br />I modelled this while asking if the birth of the Church was a foreshadowing of the coming Rapture? If so, may we inquire as to the time of day?<br /><br />If my dates are right then the Sabbath began at sunset on Friday, May 22, 33AD. Peter gives us the time of day of the Baptism of the Holy Spirit via (Acts 2:15 NKJV), <br /><br />"For these are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is only the third hour of the day."<br /><br />...with the third hour of the day being about or shortly after 9am.<br /><br /><br />If, by this model, we understand the Church as being the 42nd generation from Abraham, and that the Church was spiritually born, "When the Day of Pentecost had fully come," (Acts 2:1 NKJV); may we also ask the question if the birth of the Church on that first Pentecost is a foreshadowing of the Rapture? Many have answered this as "yes". If so, may we also understand that the birth of the Church about the ninth hour foreshadows the time of day of the Rapture of the Church?<br /><br />If so, we may want to be looking sometime after sunset on Friday, September 22nd and the ninth hour of Saturday, September 23rd. Looking at that time frame what do we find? That in the ninth hour of Saturday, September 23, 2017 the moon will rise over Jerusalem (According to "https://www.timeanddate.com/moon/israel/jerusalem" will be at 0-degrees elevation, 101-degrees EAST at 0916); bringing into "view" the fullness of what we here call the Sign of Revelation 12. <br /><br />This appears to fit with the timing given us by Matthew as Peter addresses the mockers who said, "They are full of new wine."<br /><br />"New wine" indeed! How prophetic and unintended by the mockers I'm sure! <br /><br />The Greek renders (Acts 2:13 NKJV) this way, <br /><br />2.13 BUT~OTHERS MOCKING WERE SAYING - OF SWEET WINE THEY HAVE BEEN FILLED.<br /><br />What sweet wine indeed! It's an image that takes me back to the Cana wedding with water, wine and marriage!<br /><br />Challenge: Dig on the details of Jewish marriage and look for parallels to the coming Rapture?<br /><br /><br />CLOSING<br /><br />Am I suggesting to know the time or day of the Rapture? No. I am simply digging for the hidden things which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied from the proverbs of Solomon saying, <br /><br />"It is the glory of God to conceal <br /> a matter, <br /> But the glory of kings is to<br /> search out a matter."<br /><br /> <br />Fear not. Question everything. Hold fast to the LORD and love like there is no tomorrow!<br /><br />Grace and peace to you, <br /><br /><br />Pastor RichPastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-49899536566814598962017-09-03T16:55:23.543-05:002017-09-03T16:55:23.543-05:00Brilliant! (Part One)
SilentKnight, your study re...Brilliant! (Part One)<br /><br />SilentKnight, your study reminded me of a study I had done on the line of Jesus through both Joseph and Mary. Along the way I had mapped the generations on a spreadsheet to graphically layout how each generation gives rise to the next. Each generation begins with the father of the next and each father being given a number to refer to the generational iteration.<br /><br />We know that there were 42-generations given us in The Gospel According to Matthew. My intention was to see what that looked like visually counting generations and lining them up according to (Matthew 1:17 NKJV)<br /><br />"So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, from David until the captivity in Babylon are fourteen generations, and from the captivity in Babylon until the Christ are fourteen generations."<br /><br />Here is what I found: The model understand that G-D is the Father of Abraham. Each father/son generation is assigned a generational number. Two methods are used starting with generation "0" or starting with generation "1". Thus the first generation of G-D the Father of Abraham is assigned the number zero "0" in one column and "1" in an adjacent column. The first generation of Abraham in this family tree would be assigned the number "1" or "2" depending on where we begin the count. <br /><br />The layout understands that father and son share the same row but adjacent columns. Each row begins with the father and ends with the son. The son of one row is then the father of the next. This is the structure that is given in Scripture and that which is required to create the pattern that gives us 14-generations of (Matthew 1:1-6 NKJV), 14-generations of (Matthew 1:7-11 NKJV) and the 14-generations of (Matthew 1:12-16).<br /><br />Tracking to the 40th generation from G-D we find Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus. (I will let you unpack the significance of "40" in this context). G-D in Christ by the Holy Spirit gave rise (birth) to the Church on Pentecost, thus the Church (we) were born of the 42nd generation from our father Abraham as children of Christ.<br /><br />Looking at the generations by column you will either see that from G-D to Christ there are 42-generations (0-41) or that from Abraham to the Church there are 42-generations (1-42).<br /><br />I added an additional reference using the days of the week to represent each generation. Keeping the Sabbath holy I used Sunday as the first day of creation and Abraham's birth. (Remember that this is a figurative reference to a day of the week not literal). Tracking the days through the generations we find that David, son of Jesse, was "born" on the Sabbath. Joseph, son of Jacob of the house of David, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, falls on a "Friday" and that Christ, Fathers the Church by His Holy Spirit on the Sabbath (Saturday). In other words, the seven day model suggests that the Church could be born on a Sabbath.<br /><br />Remember, my use of days of the week (above) are symbolic and not literal. They are being used as part of a search for patterns of evidence. One pattern which is clearly seen is in 42-days or six, sevens. (7+7+7+7+7+7=42)Pastor Richhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09311564658668497654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-923571518579487836.post-31058462025468434282017-09-03T16:46:51.129-05:002017-09-03T16:46:51.129-05:00Hi Liar GaryHi Liar GaryMariannehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12641346847167564911noreply@blogger.com