Featured Articles


Updates From Parable Of The Vineyard And Scottie Clarke

New videos out from Parable of the Vineyard and Scottie Clarke.  There is also a new video from Jaco Prinsloo.

Post A Comment


  1. Jeff Wingo's site. A fantastic place for those concerned and interested in the anti-messiah's connection to the UFO phenomenon and the appearance of the rebel host.


  2. Thank you, Gary! Great job, Adam and Jaco!

    1. Mr. Clarke,

      Do you think the rapture will be a fleet of ships taking people up?

      Are you out in California?


    2. 'Do you think the rapture will be a fleet of ships taking people up?'

      Eh, no. Even I could tell you that. The Rapture is not an alien abduction: it's the Lord Jesus Christ coming down to Earth and supernaturally taking us away.

    3. Scottie, Do you feel there is a connection in Leviticus 12, and the eclipse on August 21 2017? Let me explain my thinking. Leviticus 12 is the law concerning a woman who gives birth to a male child. She shall be impure for 7 days, then on the 8th day the child is circumcised. Thus the shedding of the unneeded flesh. Then she shall remain impure for an additional 33 days. The is the law concerning a natural physical birth of a male child. Revelation 12 is the depiction of a spiritual birth of a male child. Physical and Spiritual are opposites,...therefore the periods of days of impurity should be reversed. The eclipse occurs on the first day of Teshuvah...(Repentance) 33 days later is September 23. At sunset on the 23rd, at the very moment the 8th day begins is the shedding of unneeded flesh. Then 7 remaining days to Yom Kippur. These 7 days are the days of awe or the terrible days. Showing a picture of the 7 years of tribulation. Or maybe during these days is a time of great stress resulting in the signing of a covenant of 7 years following. In either case...the 33 days leading to the 8th day then the remaining 7 days would put the Law and the Prophets in agreement. This agreement is extremely important to God. Thoughts....................

  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

  4. One of the arguments against the sign, and it was brought up in the Scott Clarke video, is the fact that Jupiter, during the pregnancy period moves outside the lines of the body of Virgo. This I believe is by design. If God wanted to the retrograde motion to stay within the lines he could have. What we are seeing here is a two dimensional representation of a three dimensional woman in real life. In real life a woman's body expands to accommodate the growing child. A woman begins to show at between 12 and 16 weeks. As long as the crossing occurs during or after this period of 12 to 16 weeks, and the crossing outside the lines is minor, the symbolism works. Her body is growing to accommodate the growing child! That's what we are being shown!

    1. Good insight....makes sense. Also as Scott said...there are no lines in space. We believe we have the Spirit on this...something the natural thinking pharisee's can't understand.

    2. It's true, there are no lines in space, and no drawings of wombs, women, or lions either....drawings are more subjective than classical lines, and classical lines are the best we have. One observation is that while labor and birth are part of the heavenly signs of Revelation 12, conception and pregnancy are not specifically mentioned that I know of....therefore, I am not too concerned with where Jupiter moves relative to lines prior to labor and birth. It is interesting that "conception" on 17 December (defined by Jupiter entering Virgo by crossing the line between Spica and Theta Virginis) corresponded to the uprooting of Amona on 18 Decmeber, and the UNSC resolution on 23 December, 9 months prior to the "labor" of 23 September...nevertheless, conception and pregnancy are not technically a part of the sign describe in detail by John

  5. Regarding the Scott Clarke Video at about 28:45 -Concerning the Isaiah 66:7 verse... "Before she was in labor, she gave birth; Before her pain came, She delivered a male child. Think about this, God cursed Eve for disobeying in the Garden of Eden. Now go to Genesis 3:16 To the woman He said: I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; In pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire will be for your husband, And he shall rule over you." Seems to appear the pain (curse) of the child birth in Isaiah 66:7 is lifted! ~ Tryphena

    1. Only sort of. The pain here is in reference to the travail of the tribulation period. Israel/Mary brought forth the male child Christ before Israel labored in the coming tribulation. Also reference to Revelation 12. Here we see the woman cry out in pain to be delivered, Isaiah records as soon as she travails she brings forth her children. Isaiah 66 7 Before she travailed, she brought forth; before her pain came, she was delivered of a man child.

      8 Who hath heard such a thing? who hath seen such things? Shall the earth be made to bring forth in one day? or shall a nation be born at once? for as soon as Zion travailed, she brought forth her children.

      Here we see the intimate connection Christ has with his body of believers, and our intimate connection with Him. Astounding who we actually are. Created...born to be above the angels.

  6. Through personal communication with Mike Svigel, he does not claim the births of Isaiah 66 and Rev 12 are one and the same, with one being of labor, the other prior to labor.....his main point is that the corporate use of huion-arsen in Rev 12 is "parallel" to that of Isaiah 66, meaning that the birth of labor in Rev 12 is a corporate body



[Top Post][grids]

World News

[Top World News][bleft]



Bible Study

[Bible Study][list]





Wolf Watch


Birth Pangs

[Birth Pangs][bleft]




[Top Science][list]

In-Depth Articles